Wednesday, March 21, 2012

TRAGEDY.




When commonly asked the question: "What is the greatest tragedy?", overwhelmingly the answer is almost always - "When a child dies before their parents". And that was never proven more true than this very week, in Toulouse, France.

Three little children and their Rabbi - shot point blank by "an unidentified shooter" was what the news reels were showing...... and not a whole lot else. Well, JUST like in the Ft Hood massacre (with Major Nadal Hussein)...the truth outed itself eventually - with the killings being committed by an ISLAMIST EXTREMIST. Yup. The guy's name is Mohammed Merah. And apparently he was identified because he BRAGGED about killing these precious sweet children. Within this SAME news cycle a video on youtube, of a THREE year old in a wheelchair getting searched by a TSA agent went viral. SOOOOoooo..... a THREE YEAR OLD KID, in a wheelchair because of his little broken leg, gets MORE SCRUTINY than an early twenties, algerian/middle eastern, MUSLIM carrying a QU'RAN. And SHOULD that Muslim young man get - God forbid - PROFILED.... every P C IDJIT on the planet would be HOWLING with angst and outrage at racial profiling. Huh. That's FUNNY. I haven't heard the ACLU howling about these JEWISH children getting shot. No outrage from the White HOuse? BARELY any coverage by the liberal media until today. Hmmmmm......it makes one think, doesn't it?


Ahem. ATTENTION: All you politically correct people out there, with your mealymouthed trite responses about "peaceful Islam", and those of you who TRULY don't understand what the point of Islam is - and why it continues to produce SERIAL KILLERS like this guy.....If you desire - AT ALL - to learn about a religion that produces the Mohammed Merahs, the Mohammed Attas and the Major Nadal Husseins of the word...and the tragedy and destruction that they wreak everywhere they go... visit THIS site and freaking LEARN MORE.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ib9rofXQl6w


In the meantime, let us remember these beautiful little children and the TRULY peace loving Rabbi that were martyred, literally, for their religion. Let us remember these people...victims of profiling themselves...Now THAT....is a TRAGEDY.

The REFORM REPUBLICANS budget....

The resounding whiny, bit**y, snarky accusation from the Democrat party, Obama, himself, and his administration is constantly that Republicans criticize, criticize and criticize but never posit their OWN solutions. The most frequent application of this? Specifically in regards to the BUDGET. I guess Democrats in DC and Obama and his peeps don't take kindly to the fact that Republicans continue to ask - 1.) WHY ARE WE SPENDING MORE MONEY ON ENTITLEMENT PROGRAMS LIKE WELFARE when the taxpayers footing the bill are making less than they have ever made...and 2.) HOW ARE WE GONNA PAY FOR THIS ADDITIONAL SPENDING?

So in typical deflection mode - rather than answer these exceptionally relevant questions - liberals play the "oh-yeah?-where-is-YOUR-budget-nanny-nanny-boo-booo" game. Again, and again, Republicans and conservatives (and yes, sometimes those terms are mutually exclusive) DO propose ideas and budgets and the most recent of which is the Republican House of Representatives budget. The Wall Street Journal wrote an EXCELLENT editorial breaking this budget down for general consumption. I have quoted it below, and I exhort you to EDUCATE yourself and start reading.....now.

The introduction of Paul Ryan's House fiscal 2013 budget yesterday is an important political moment even if it has no chance of becoming law this year. It shows that the reform wing of the Republican Party is alive and well, one year after Democrats and the press corps had called Mr. Ryan's fiscal 2012 budget political suicide.

Perhaps you remember the TV spot in which Democrats had an actor resembling Mr. Ryan dump grandma in a wheel chair off a cliff. Democrats chortled that the Budget Chairman's Medicare reform would help them retake the House in 2012, and President Obama chipped in by trashing Mr. Ryan as he sat in the front row as a White House-invited guest to a speech at George Washington University.

But a funny thing happened on the way to oblivion. Mr. Ryan survived. GOP candidates in special elections beat back the Mediscare onslaught. Slowly, the causes of entitlement and tax reform have advanced, picking up converts and forcing GOP Presidential candidates to embrace them at least in part.

Far from retreating on Medicare, Mr. Ryan once more leads the charge by re-proposing his "premium support" reform. The plan would offer seniors a fixed payment to buy insurance from a government-approved list of vendors. So, for example, a retiree stepping down from a private business with insurance from Aetna would be able to slide smoothly to an Aetna Medicare policy.

Mr. Ryan's concession this year is that his formula for increasing the support payment over time would be more generous. And as part of his compromise with Oregon Democrat Ron Wyden, Mr. Ryan would allow seniors to stay on fee-for-service Medicare if they prefer. The policy bet is that seniors will migrate en masse to private plans over time given the right incentives. The compromise is an easier sell politically, though it means reform (and thus any savings) would be more gradual.

The White House in its re-election bunker claims that all of this will "destroy Medicare as we know it," but in fact it is the only reform that will prevent Medicare from destroying itself. Mr. Obama's demagoguery on this subject is his Presidency at its most cynical.

The Ryan budget also stakes out clear policy differences with the President on taxes and spending. Mr. Ryan's proposal would reduce spending over a decade by some $5 trillion. Mr. Obama's would increase spending by $1.5 trillion above the current budget baseline. Spending as a share of GDP never falls below 23% under Mr. Obama but slows to 20% of GDP under Mr. Ryan.

Mr. Obama's budget contains $1.9 trillion in tax increases over the next decade and raises income, dividend and capital gains tax rates. The Ryan budget outlines an ambitious tax reform, collapsing today's six rates to two—25% and 10%—while retaining the 15% tax rates on capital gains and dividends and eliminating inefficient tax deductions and credits. He gets the corporate tax down to 25%, roughly the international average, and below the 28% rate Mr. Obama suggests. The Ryan plan isn't a pure flat tax, but it takes the IRS code a giant stride in that direction and creates a tax system far more conducive to faster job creation and greater investment.

The House Republican budget includes a host of other major reforms, notably block-granting Medicaid, food stamps and dozens of other welfare programs to states. Republican Governors have told the White House and Congress that this is a deal they would readily take: less money but more discretion and fewer federal rules.

This is crucial to balancing the budget. Medicaid is expected to cost $804 billion by 2019, more than double the $379 billion in 2009. Because of Medicaid's rationing through price controls, it also provides a low level of care. Mr. Ryan notes that "by some measures, such as in-hospital death rates following major surgeries, Medicaid patients fared even worse than the uninsured." ObamaCare would put some 15 million more Americans on Medicaid.

One complaint about Mr. Ryan's budget, especially from conservatives, is that it won't balance the budget within 10 years. But the most important goal is to get the deficit down to a manageable level of GDP. The Ryan budget gets the deficit down to 3% of GDP by 2015, a gigantic improvement over the roughly 9% average in Mr. Obama's four years. With pro-growth tax and budget reforms, the economy will grow much faster and the budget could well be balanced sooner than even Mr. Ryan predicts.

Details aside, the Ryan budget shows a House majority that realizes it has an obligation to reform the listing, unaffordable entitlement state. The GOP's reform impulse withered under George W. Bush and Tom DeLay, but it has seen a revival with Governors like Mitch Daniels (Indiana), Scott Walker (Wisconsin), John Kasich (Ohio), Sam Brownback (Kansas) and Bobby Jindal (Louisiana)

Many Republicans are still afraid and would prefer to dodge these great debates. But if voters want the status quo, they can vote for Pelosi Democrats. The country wants leaders who are willing to risk their popularity to address America's serious problems. The Ryan budget is a worthy marker.

Friday, February 24, 2012

WSJ on "Obama's Forrest Gump analysis of rising gas prices"



http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203918304577241623995642182.html?mod=opinion_newsreel



REVIEW & OUTLOOK FEBRUARY 24, 2012
'Stupid' and Oil Prices
Obama's Forrest Gump analysis of rising gas prices.

'The American people aren't stupid," thundered President Obama yesterday in Miami, ridiculing Republicans who are blaming him for rising gasoline prices. Let's hope he's right, because not even Forrest Gump could believe the logic of what Mr. Obama is trying to sell.

To wit, that a) gasoline prices are beyond his control, but b) to the extent oil and gas production is rising in America, his energy policies deserve all the credit, and c) higher prices are one more reason to raise taxes on oil and gas drillers while handing even more subsidies to his friends in green energy. Where to begin?

It's true enough that oil prices can't be commanded from the Oval Office, so in that sense Mr. Obama's disavowal of blame is a rare show of humility in the face of market forces. Would that he showed similar modesty in trying to command the tides of home prices, car sales ("cash for clunkers"), or the production of electric batteries.

The oil price surge has several likely sources. One is the turmoil in the Middle East, especially new fears of a supply shock from a conflict with Iran. But it's worth recalling that Mr. Obama also blamed the last oil-price surge, in spring 2011, on the Libyan uprising. Moammar Gadhafi is now gone and Libyan oil production is coming back on stream, yet oil prices dipped only briefly below $90 a barrel and have been rising since October. Something else must be going on.

Mr. Obama yesterday blamed rising demand from the likes of Brazil and China, and there is something to that as well. But this energy demand is also not new, and if anything Chinese and Brazilian economic growth has been slowing in recent months.

Another suspect—one Mr. Obama doesn't like to mention—is U.S. monetary policy. Oil is traded in dollars, and its price therefore rises when the value of the dollar falls, all else being equal. The Federal Reserve throughout Mr. Obama's term has pursued the easiest monetary policy in modern times, expressly to revive the housing market. It has done so with the private support and urging of the White House and through Mr. Obama's appointees who are now a majority on the Fed's Board of Governors.


Associated Press
Oil staged its last price surge along with other commodity prices when the Fed revved up its second burst of "quantitative easing" in 2010-2011. Prices stabilized when QE2 ended. But in recent months the Fed has again signaled its commitment to near-zero interest rates first through 2013, and recently through 2014. Commodity prices, including oil, have since begun another surge, and hedge funds have begun to bet on commodity plays again. John Paulson says he's betting on gold, the ultimate hedge against a falling dollar.

Fed officials and Mr. Obama want to take credit for easy money if stock-market and housing prices rise, but then deny any responsibility if commodity prices rise too, causing food and energy prices to soar for consumers. They can't have it both ways, as not-so-stupid Americans intuitively understand when they buy groceries or gas. This is the double-edged sword of an economic recovery "built to last" on easy money rather than on sound fiscal and regulatory policies.

As for domestic energy, Mr. Obama rightly points to the rising share of U.S. oil consumption now produced at home. But this trend began in the late Bush Administration, which opened up large new areas on and offshore for oil and gas drilling that are now coming on stream. Mr. Obama sneered at expanded drilling as a candidate in 2008 and for most of his term has done little to expand it.

In early 2010, he proposed to open some new areas to drilling but shut that down after the Gulf oil spill. According to the Greater New Orleans Gulf Permits Index for January 31, over the previous three months the feds issued an average of three deep-water drilling permits a month compared to the historical average of seven. Over the same three months, the feds approved an average of 4.7 shallow-water permits a month, compared to the historical average of 14.7.

Approval of an offshore drilling plan now takes 92 days, 31 more than the historical average. And so far in 2012, an average of 23% of all drilling plans have been approved, compared to the average of 73.4%.

Oh, and don't forget the Keystone XL pipeline, which would have increased the delivery of oil from Canada and North Dakota's Bakken Shale to Gulf Coast refineries, replacing oil from Venezuela.

The reality is that most of the increase in U.S. oil and gas production has come despite the Obama Administration. It is flowing from the shale boom, which is the result of private technological advances and investment. Mr. Obama has seen the energy sun rise and is crowing like a rooster that he made it happen.

Mr. Obama yesterday also repeated his proposal that now is the time to raise taxes on oil and gas companies, as if doing so will make them more likely to drill. He must not believe the economic truism that when you tax something you get less of it, including fewer of the new jobs they've created.

***
We'd almost feel sorry for Mr. Obama's gas-price predicament if it weren't a case of rough justice. The President has deliberately sought to raise the price of energy throughout the economy via his cap-and-trade agenda. He is now getting his wish, albeit a little too overtly for political comfort. Mr. Obama has also spent three years blaming George W. Bush for every economic ill. If Mr. Obama now feels frustrated by economic events beyond his control, perhaps he should call Mr. Bush for consolation.

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Eye opening....

What a GREAT clip. I LOVE this guy....if only more of our famous people were more like Mark Wahlberg.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKAyExg_kJ0&feature=player_embedded

Monday, November 7, 2011

On Tim Tebow, Politics & America..or..."What if Tim Tebow were a Muslim?"



Click on the title of this post, and it will link to an extraordinary commentary on Tebow, politics and America today. Take the few minutes that it takes to read this brilliant and illuminating article written by Jen Engel, one of my favorite sports writers ever.... It's flippin' AWESOME. Oh, and btw, if you feel the same way I do? Pass it on, yo.

Friday, September 9, 2011

IN THE NEWS...headlines spun my way, yo.


I can't stop laughing right now and actually NONE of what is making me laugh is about politics- it's how funny and stoopit people can be!

Before I start - let me elucidate... There is absolutely nothing funny about Obama and company trying to perpetrate another 300 billion dollar magnificent show of INCOMPETENCE. Lest you forget - regardless of the gross sums of money they've thrown around - NOTHING this liberal progressive president, administration and (prior to the last changing of the guard)BOTH houses of Congress have tried...has worked. Unemployment is a fully 2 - 3 points higher than when he took over. EFFECTIVE unemployment is in the high teens. (Look it up.) And you know what - WORST OF ALL - blacks, women and children are suffering the WORST rates of unemployment...some of which are in Obama's staunchest supporters district (check Maxine-in-your-face-Waters' district). Pathetic. Like I said - it's JUST NOT FUNNY. So because of that? I'm gonna do an "In the News" and NOT USE ONE POLITICAL REFERENCE. Don't think I can do it? Watch me, yo.

here we go...

WOMAN ATTACKED BY RAT ON NEW YORK SUBWAY:
Yeah. You heard right. Turns out the poor little RAT had hitchhiked here from Somalia. I don't know that. I just felt like including Somalia in this post. Can I point out a few salient facts?
1.) If that lady had offered to share with RATatouille....he wouldn't have had to BITE her. Helllooo!!!
2.) I'm a little curious as to why that Rat was so hungry....he's sort of a fat, chunky little feller, ain't he?
3.) Seriously - WHAT IS THIS WORLD COMING TO!!! When one has to fight for their leftovers with Ratticus Maximus?!!

MISS UNIVERSE HOPEFUL CONTESTANT TOLD TO WEAR PANTIES:
Uh. Apparently she got the wrong intel on how to get ahead in life. Her buddies, Sharon Stone and Britney thought it would make people like her more. Guess not. My words of wisdom for Miss Columbia? An oldie but goodie in that classical language that I find is HIGHLY underused to this day. Semper ubi sub ubi. .....Always wear underwear. I mean. That's all I got for Flasher McFlasherson. Serio.

And finally - in the Fred "Lamar, you a BIG DUMMY" Sanford column,,,,

WOMAN DIES AFTER INJECTING HOT BEEF FAT INTO HER FACE:
If it weren't so amazingly colossally STOOPIT - it would be sad. Apparently this lady had done multiple surgeries on her face originally. I guess then she figured why go pro - why not DIY it? "The victim was reportedly 'obsessed' with the process of performing self injections and had developed her own 'process' ...she would boil the beef herself, extract the fact and inject it into her face. Hardt went to the hospital after complaining that her face felt like it was burning. "

OK.....SERIOUSLY???? As a postscript: apparently just prior to her untimely demise, she had officially been declared the WINNER of the Oscar Meyer Weiner HotDog prize for STUPIDIDIOT Of The Year. Every year. Ever.


And THAT is what's IN THE NEWS, folks!